|
| |
Covalent Networks
| Boron, carbon and silicon form networks rather than
molecules. You should commit that fact to memory. |
 |
| Look at the electron dot diagram for carbon. (This sequnce is also shown
in example 22.) |
|
| We can show the bond between this atom and another carbon in this way. But
notice that this doesn't satisfy the octet rule for this first carbon atom. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
· |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
· |
C |
· |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
· |
|
·· |
|
· |
|
|
|
|
|
· |
C |
: |
C |
: |
C |
· |
|
|
|
|
|
· |
|
·· |
|
· |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
· |
C |
· |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
· |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| To do that we'd need another carbon atom and another and another. Then
each of those carbon atoms would need another and another and another and another and
another and so on. This pattern, which is shown here in two dimensions, actually exists in
three dimensions. |
|
|
|
|
|
· |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
· |
C |
· |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
· |
|
·· |
|
· |
|
|
|
|
|
· |
C |
: |
C |
: |
C |
· |
|
|
|
· |
|
·· |
|
·· |
|
·· |
|
· |
|
| · |
C |
: |
C |
: |
C |
: |
C |
: |
C |
· |
|
· |
|
·· |
|
·· |
|
·· |
|
· |
|
|
|
· |
C |
: |
C |
|
C |
· |
|
|
|
|
|
· |
|
·· |
|
· |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
· |
C |
· |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
· |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| It is the diamond form of carbon, which is shown here.
This model is also in the lab for you to look at when you are there. It has the same
pattern of atoms as the diagram above, except that two colors are used to reperesent the
carbon atoms. |

|
| However, if you start taking a look at the different dimensions of this
thing, you can see that quite a different set of patterns arise. The reason for the
different colors in this model is to emphasize certain bonding patterns. You can see that
there are planes or layers of atoms. |
 |
| In the orientation shown to the right, you can see that the light ones are
a little bit higher than the black ones. So you can see that it is a matter of position,
rather than types of atoms. But that gives you a picture of what the diamond arrangement
is like. Notice that each carbon atom is bonded to four other carbon atoms. |
 |
| Another form of carbon is graphite and its arrangement
can be envisioned by taking the puckered planes of atoms from the diamond form and making
them flat. If you do that, then you end up with the graphite form of carbon. The atoms are
arranged slightly differently. From the side you can see that the graphite has planes of
carbon atoms that are somewhat more distant from the next plane than was the case with
diamond. That is what gives graphite its slippery quality. This plane of atoms can slide
on this plane of atoms because they are not quite so strongly bonded. |
 |
| By changing the angle of view, you can see a hexagonal pattern. From this
angle, it looks very much like the diamond. These are the two most common forms of carbon.
Diamond and graphite. |
 |
| Another form of the element carbon that is not as common but is making
news are the Buckminsterfullerenes, also called Bucky balls, which contain clusters of
carbon atoms. This particular model emphasizes the bonds. Each point where the bonds come
together represents a carbon atom. These Bucky balls each contain about sixty carbon
atoms, some contain 60, some 70, some 72. This is a form of carbon that has been making
the news during the past several years. |
 |
Models of these different forms of carbon are available for you to look at when you are
in the lab.
Silicon has essentially the same bonding pattern as diamond. Diamond, graphite and
silicon are important enough materials that you should specifically remember that they are
covalent network materials.
Comparing Molecules and Networks
Another common covalent network material is the compound silicon dioxide, SiO2,
also known as quartz. It is a covalent network material even though its
formula is very similar to that of carbon dioxide which is a covalent molecular
material. Why is the bonding arrangement so different?
| Take another look at carbon dioxide, CO2, which we've talked
about before. (It is also shown in example 24-a.) Because a carbon atom is smaller and has
a greater pull on electrons than a silicon atom, its four electrons can be concentrated
into two double bonds to the oxygen atoms. |
··
··
O : : C : : O
··
·· |
| Because silicon is larger and has less pull on its
electrons, its electrons are spread out in four single bonds with four oxygen atoms. (Also
shown in example 24-b.) This leaves each oxygen atom with the ability, actually, the necessity
to bond to other atoms. Each oxygen atom shown here will bond to another silicon atom
(shown in example 24-c), and each silicon atom will bond to more oxygen atoms. You can
imagine that the network of covalently bonded silicon and oxygen atoms can continue
indefinitely. |
·
: O :
·· ·· ··
· O : Si : O ·
·· ·· ··
: O :
· |
| If you look carefully at this three-dimensional model of quartz, you can
see that the bonding is quite extensive. This three-dimensional model of quartz is in
the lab so that you can look at it first hand when you are in the lab. At that time, you
can also see that the alignment of the atoms parallels the faces of a quartz crystal. |
 |

| Let me summarize a few points about covalent materials. If you have
covalent bonding, you may have elements or compounds.
Also, you may have either network or molecular
materials. Usually it will be molecular. The only examples of network covalent
bonding that you have to worry about for this course are carbon, in the form of diamond
and graphite, silicon, and silicon dioxide, SiO2, which is commonly known as
quartz. Any material in this course which has just covalent bonding other than graphite,
diamond, silicon, or quartz, will be a molecular material. |
| Covalent Bonding |
Element
or
Compound |
Network (C, Si, SiO2)
or
Molecular |
|
Top of Page
Back to Course Homepage

E-mail instructor:
Eden Francis
Clackamas Community College
©1998, 1999 Clackamas Community College
|